Rep. Tulsi Gabbard solid her reluctance to sentence Syrian President Bashar Assad as a byproduct of her navy service throughout the Iraq warfare. | Alex Wroblewski/Getty Photos
Presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) declined Sunday to say whether or not Syrian President Bashar Assad is a warfare legal, and didn’t reply whether or not she would belief her personal intelligence group if elected commander in chief.
“I feel that the proof must be gathered, and as I’ve stated earlier than, if there may be proof that he has dedicated warfare crimes, he ought to be prosecuted as such,” Gabbard informed CNN host Dana Bash throughout a city corridor occasion in Austin, Texas.
Story Continued Beneath
The remarks from Gabbard characterize the most recent entry in what lawmakers from each events have criticized as a disconcerting posture towards Assad, which emerged when the Aloha State lawmaker made an unannounced go to to the Center East strongman two years in the past.
Gabbard beforehand stated she was “skeptical” that Assad’s authorities perpetrated a chemical weapons assault in April 2017 that killed dozens of Syrians, though the Protection Division and the United Nations discovered that his regime was accountable for the slaughter.
Gabbard on Sunday solid her reluctance to sentence Assad as a byproduct of her navy service throughout the Iraq warfare.
COUNTDOWN TO 2020
The race for 2020 begins now. Keep within the know. Comply with our presidential election protection.
By signing up you conform to obtain electronic mail newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You possibly can unsubscribe at any time.
“I served in a warfare in Iraq — a warfare that was launched based mostly on lies, and a warfare that was launched with out proof. And so the American folks had been duped,” Gabbard stated. “In order a soldier, as an American, as a member of Congress, it’s my obligation and my duty to train skepticism any time anybody tries to ship our service members into hurt’s approach or use our navy to go in and begin a brand new warfare.”
And when pressed on whether or not she would settle for the conclusions of America’s intelligence businesses as president, Gabbard demurred: “Like I stated, we have now, in our current previous, a state of affairs the place our personal authorities informed lies to the American folks, and to the United Nations for that matter, to launch a warfare.”
She added: “It’s our duty to train due diligence, to ask the powerful questions, to get the proof earlier than we make these very expensive choices about how and when and the place our navy is used.”
Gabbard’s city corridor was the second of three consecutive ones hosted Sunday night time by CNN, between hour-long occasions for former Maryland Rep. John Delaney and South Bend (Ind.) Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
This text tagged beneath:
Lacking out on the most recent scoops? Join POLITICO Playbook and get the most recent information, each morning — in your inbox.